Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m2HAZI8-00007dC; Thu, 7 Feb 136 09:32 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8345; Wed, 15 Mar 95 19:10:28 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8343; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 19:10:27 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4322; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 18:06:26 +0100 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 16:57:19 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: Truth X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: (Your message of Wed, 15 Mar 95 03:57:20 EST.) <199503150857.AA23334@access4.digex.net> Content-Length: 455 Lines: 19 Lojbab: > Ooops. How about lo si'o da po'u cerlok. xolmes. cu prenu I described the idea of S.H. being a person. That's much more restricted than "I described Sherlock Holmes". I think I would aim for something like "I described the idea of some properties of S.H,". What would that be? da zohu mi describe lo siho da property la cerlok xolmes or da zohu mi say le duhu da property la cerlok [no gihuste to hand, & memory gone blank] -- And