Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rob4Q-00007dC; Tue, 14 Mar 95 20:11 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 0749; Tue, 14 Mar 95 20:12:06 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0747; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 20:12:06 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9171; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 19:08:06 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1995 12:31:29 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Subject: Re: mo'e X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 517 Lines: 15 > >Which one is right? If {mo'e de} means "some number de", then I can't > >imagine what {mo'e pa plise} could mean. > > I was ellipsizing the restriction. How about mo'e de poi namcu > (actually I might want namcu in the range 1-7 or something like that). That's still different from some number de. {de poi namcu} could be {li ci} for example. Is {mo'e li ci} the same as {ci} as a quantifier? Or is it the number of numbers three, like supposedly {mo'e pa plise} is the number of apples in "one apple"? Jorge