From jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:47:01 2010
From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Subject:      Re: On {lo} and existence
Date: Wed Mar  1 22:21:49 1995
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Mar  1 22:21:49 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Message-ID: <ktCq65JF9YD.A.HmG.lv0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

> > > My first choice would be that {nu broda} be a real event of brodaing.
> > > I can accept it being a potential event of brodaing, but I'd hate to
> > > let {lo broda} be anything other than a this-world broda.
> > > ("This world" being the world in which the discourse takes place.)
> >
> > I think that of those who've expressed a view, only Lojbab doesn't
> > go along with your first or second choice, though of the remainder
> > I don't know whether it is your first or your second choice that
> > they prefer. John & pc said they agree with you, but the status
> > of {nu} wasn't mentioned.
>
> .i cai lo remoi
>
> no'i ru'a
> .i la'elu mi skicu lonu mi seltu'e li'u ka'e jetnu
> .i la'elu mi skicu lenu mi selna'i li'u ka'e jetnu
> .i la'elu mi skicu lonu mi selna'i li'u na li'a jetnu

i la'e di'u stidi le du'u do zmanei le pamoi enai le remoi

> co'o mi'e. goran.

co'o mi'e xorxes