From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Sat Mar 11 13:25:58 1995 From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Date: Sat Mar 11 13:25:58 1995 Subject: Re: On {lo} and existence Status: RO Message-ID: And: > My intention is that dahi(nai) is not defined by the existence of > an imaginer or restrictable by the identity of an imaginer. "Imaginary" > is simply the complement of "real". I guess this takes us too much into metaphysics. Is there such a thing as a language independently of its users? You seem to like to think that there is, I tend to think not, at least right now. Lojban seems to favour my point of view, given that bangu has an x2 place... :) Jorge