Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rnKjF-00007ZC; Sat, 11 Mar 95 08:32 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.10+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA08306 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 08:32:44 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HO00G77FM80025KT@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 06:28:45 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6867; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 07:29:00 +0100 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 1995 01:31:32 -0500 From: Logical Language Group Subject: sselbri as sumti Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: Logical Language Group Message-id: <01HO00G780C20025KT@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1402 Lines: 40 >From: ucleaar >Subject: selbri as sumti > >PROBLEM ONE >How can we say "I always do my shopping on the same day of the >week"? >This seems to me to involve (a) existential quantification over >days of the week {Monday or Tuesday or ... or Sunday }, and >then (b) universal quantification over the result of (a) (i.e. >over instances of that day of the week). The versions that Chris and Jorge posted both seem to only imply that the shopping is done on one day of the week, not that it is the SAME day each week. I see two ways ro da poi jeftu de poi di poi djedi zo'u di mo'edemoi lo'e ze jefydje zo'u mi tervecnu which is explicit but incredibly hard to figure how to say on the fly (not to mention that no one will remember that mo'e is the sumti to number converter) or the slightly elliptical but much shorter and clearer roda poi jeftu mi tervecnu ca lo tu'omoi jefydje >The best I can do is: > da poi jefydje zohu I shop ca ro me da >which has the drawbacks of (a) the vagueness of {me}, and >(b) the necessity of using the prenex. > >Jefydje is a category whose members are categories themselves. If the hangup is whether something is a category of something or is the thing itself, we have klesi and jutsi for defining subcategories, and cmima among others for indicating membership within the category. porsi may also fit in here somewhere. lojbab