Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rvs5n-0009aeC; Mon, 3 Apr 95 22:47 EET DST Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.11p1+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id WAA04040 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 22:47:18 +0300 Received: from LISTSERV.FUNET.FI (LISTSERV@FIPORT) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HOWX0XAGXS000DYV@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Mon, 03 Apr 1995 19:47:04 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 1995 20:00:41 +0100 From: ucleaar Subject: Re: More about scopes In-reply-to: (Your message of Sun, 02 Apr 95 18:58:34 EDT.) Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: ucleaar Message-id: <01HOWX0XB976000DYV@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 531 Lines: 17 > (4) le ci nanmu cu bevri pa tanxe goi ko'a > Each of the three men carries it, one box. > > This is very different from (1), because now they are all carrying > the same box. Otherwise, when we next refer to ko'a we wouldn't know > which box it was! > > My conclusion is that {goi} forces the scope of {pa} in this case > to be wider than that of {ro le ci nanmu}. Am I right? Ax, x is one of le ci nanmu, Ey, y is a box, x carries y, y = Koha. That looks fine to me, & pa is within scope of le ci namnmu. --- And