Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0s1PnV-0009acC; Wed, 19 Apr 95 05:47 EET DST Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id FAA12200 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 05:47:20 +0300 Received: from LISTSERV.FUNET.FI (LISTSERV@FIPORT) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HPHQUN0YXC0000B9@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 02:47:16 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1995 12:35:38 -0400 From: John Cowan Subject: Re: More about scopes In-reply-to: <199504091944.PAA29442@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Apr 9, 95 03:53:26 pm Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: John Cowan Message-id: <01HPIA32HQJ20000B9@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: Lojban List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 587 Lines: 18 la xorxes. cusku di'e > > Then I don't see the point of {ro} being the default. {piro} seems much > > better. la .and. cusku di'e > I agree. {piro} makes more sense. I suppose I should have said that when referring to individuals, "ro" is the default, and when referring to masses, "pisu'o" is the default. (Whether it should be "pisu'o" or "piro" hangs on the question of how the mass fractionator issue is resolved, which should be C-4 on Jorge's list.) -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.