Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rxbh4-0009acC; Sat, 8 Apr 95 17:40 EET DST Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.11p1+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id RAA07533 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 17:40:57 +0300 Received: from LISTSERV.FUNET.FI (LISTSERV@FIPORT) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HP3LRJD5CW006U9R@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Sat, 08 Apr 1995 14:40:38 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 07 Apr 1995 15:35:28 -0400 From: John Cowan Subject: Re: More about scopes Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: John Cowan Message-id: <01HP3LRQVEU2006U9R@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 576 Lines: 15 la xorxes. cusku di'e > Ok. Now we need a default quantifier for {ko'a}. I propose {ro}, because > I see {ko'a} as a kind of {le}, just like {da} is a kind of {lo}. Check out the sumti paper at ftp://ftp.cs.yale.edu/pub/lojban/draft/refgrammar/sumti, which documents all of these points in Section 13. As you say, "ro" is the default quantifier for "ko'a". Note that the da-series have complicated rules that aren't fully explained in the paper. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.