From ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk  Sat Mar  6 22:56:10 2010
Date:         Mon, 3 Apr 1995 20:00:41 +0100
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject:      Re: More about scopes
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Apr  3 23:28:16 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Message-ID: <8Vb1vozd-LE.A.-QB.K40kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

> (4)     le ci nanmu cu bevri pa tanxe goi ko'a
>         Each of the three men carries it, one box.
>
> This is very different from (1), because now they are all carrying
> the same box. Otherwise, when we next refer to ko'a we wouldn't know
> which box it was!
>
> My conclusion is that {goi} forces the scope of {pa} in this case
> to be wider than that of {ro le ci nanmu}. Am I right?

Ax, x is one of le ci nanmu, Ey, y is a box, x carries y, y = Koha.

That looks fine to me, & pa is within scope of le ci namnmu.

---
And