From @uga.cc.uga.edu:lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Wed May 31 00:00:39 1995 Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP id AA3190 ; Wed, 31 May 95 00:00:36 BST Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk via puntmail for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk; Tue, 30 May 95 16:24:25 GMT Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by punt2.demon.co.uk id aa06428; 30 May 95 17:23 +0100 Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8393; Tue, 30 May 95 12:20:53 EDT Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2814; Tue, 30 May 1995 11:58:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 11:56:54 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Quantifiers of sets (was: quantifiers on sumti) X-To: Lojban List To: Iain Alexander In-Reply-To: <199505291905.PAA02104@locke.ccil.org> from "jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU" at May 27, 95 05:06:14 pm Message-ID: <9505301723.aa06428@punt2.demon.co.uk> Status: R la xorxes. cusku di'e > I'm not sure what's the convention about fractions of sets, I suppose > subsets is the obvious choice. Not only the obvious but also the correct choice, as determined by pc long ago. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.