From DPT@HUMA1.BITNET  Sat Mar  6 22:44:55 2010
Date:         Tue, 16 May 1995 00:28:02 -0400
From: "Dylan P. Thurston" <DPT@HUMA1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: A modest proposal #2: verdicality
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
X-From-Space-Date: Tue May 16 04:02:10 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Message-ID: <FF6MrnbplMN.A.ikE.nt0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

mi cusku di'e
 > > {ga'inai loi satcyselsku zo'u stidi}
 > > [The attitudinal paper mentions {galtu} w.r.t ga'i, which seems
 > > malglico.  {tolbanli}, maybe?]

la xorxes. cusku di'e
 > Many of the etymologies of UIs are malglico. The best thing
 > is to ignore them.

.i.ie gi'o

 > ....
 > > But I don't see why +/-verdical distinction has to be there when it can
 > > just as easily be made with a cnima'o following the brivla.
 >
 > Do as I do and ignore it.  :)

.i.ie.u'i go'i

 > > If this has been discussed before, my apologies.
 >
 > Lots and lots of times, but we never end up agreeing so we can discuss
 > it again.

.i.o'ucu'i.e'u ko joi mi'a sarxe binxo ki'u lo balvi ke jbobau cilre
cu na'e se cfipu
.i ta'o xu zo ko ka'e cmavo fi zo ma'a ji zo mi'o .i xu lo cnino
cmavo cu sarcu gi'i se djica

 > co'o mi'e xorxes

co'o mi'e. dilyn.