From DPT@HUMA1.BITNET  Sat Mar  6 22:44:58 2010
Date:         Tue, 16 May 1995 23:17:31 -0400
From: DPT@HUMA1.BITNET
Subject:      Re: TECH: Negation
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
X-From-Space-Date: Wed May 17 03:14:22 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Message-ID: <UEaY0d1atKI.A.XoE.qt0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

I wrote:
 > I found this very odd and went and checked the negation paper.  It
 > seems to be correct.

jorge wrote:
 > I think it's not correct. Does the negation paper really say it is?
 > In any case, the De Morgan's laws part of the paper is not really
 > very trustworthy, I think.

No, it doesn't actually say {ra}; I hadn't read the DeMorgan's law
section, and was relying on the earlier portions (which might be read to
imply {ra}).

 > > Please tell me I'm misinterpreting something.
 >
 > You're misinterpreting something.

.i ki'e mu'o mi'e. dilyn.