From jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:44:59 2010
Date:         Sun, 21 May 1995 17:23:17 EDT
From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Subject:      Re: {prenu} vs. {remna}
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
X-From-Space-Date: Sun May 21 17:20:15 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Message-ID: <x3e4QFtWXpO.A.ppE.rt0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la dilyn cusku di'e
> Interesting point here.  I'm not sure how editing of quotes fits in,
> though.

You are not supposed to edit quotes, otherwise it is impossible to tell
who did the editing.  Everything that appears in a line after the ">" is
not written by the current poster.  (I sometimes cut half-sentences out,
but never add anything.)

> {mabru} seems to have a wider meaning than just 'mammal', so maybe it
> could be used instead of {danlu}; either that or a lujvo:
> {nalsajydal}, perhaps?

Yes, I agree. I'd say {mabru} is probably best for that.

>  > i ue xu tikpa fasnu
>
> .i .oicaisa'e .i zo jipfau basti zo tipyfau

i cumki fa le nu jipfau fa le nu la cev cu zbasu piro loi remna i mi na
certu djuno fi le zbasu saske i ku'i ti'e la cev bartu le ze'e temci i
cy kakne le nu zbasu ro da ca lei xa djedi


>  > i ie i zo'o le nu catke le bolci sepi'o le jamfu cu tipfau
>
> .i zo'o ji'a le nu co'a se pinfu la rodneis. king. pu tipfau

i go'i  i le do mupli cu zmadu jmikli

> mu'o mi'e. dilyn. .oisai

co'o mi'e xorxes