From jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:45:00 2010
Date:         Mon, 29 May 1995 15:01:36 EDT
From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Subject:      Re: A Fuzzy Ship from Theseus
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
X-From-Space-Date: 
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Message-ID: <Itag9-8m00H.A.xqE.st0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

And:
> > je'ucai         absolutely true
> > je'usai
> > je'u
> > je'uru'e
> > je'ucu'i
> > je'unairu'e
> > je'unai
> > je'unaisai
> > je'unaicai      absolutely false
>
> These have the right meaning. Do we know how they interact with
> {na} and {jaa}?

I don't think we know much about how attitudinals interact with the rest
of things.  {ja'a} doesn't seem to present a problem, but I don't know
what would something like this be:

        je'uru'e ta na blanu
        Weakly true, that is not blue.

I suppose it could mean:

        je'unairu'e ta blanu
        Weakly false, that is blue.

But I don't know.  (And it gets even hazier if we start to look at
interactions with {je} et al.  It is easy to define that the fuzzy truth
value of a conjunction is the product of the truth values, but what does
a {je'uru'e} anded with a {je'ucu'i} give?)

Jorge