From topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR Sat Mar 6 22:45:04 2010 Date: Sat, 20 May 1995 01:03:45 METDST From: Goran Topic Subject: Re: Reflexivity and {ri} To: Bob LeChevalier X-From-Space-Date: Sat May 20 00:24:21 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Message-ID: > Here's a mildly related question. What does > > (1) la djan. prami la djan. .i la suzn. go'i John loves John, Susan loves John > (2) la djan. prami ri .i la suzn. go'i John loves John, Susan loves John > (3) la djan. prami vo'a .i la suzn. go'i John loves John, Susan loves John > (4) la djan. prami ri .i do go'i John loves John, you love John The point is, go'i copies the MEANING of the places, not the words that fill them. So, in all cases, x2 stays John. To get the words reevaluated, stick a ra'o in (pro-sumti update), i.e. la suzn. go'i ra'o That gives: 1) John loves John, Susan loves John 2) John loves John, Susan loves Susan 3) John loves John, Susan loves Susan 4) John loves John, Susan loves John > mu'o mi'e. dilyn. co'o mi'e. goran. -- .sig under construction. Read with your helmet on.