Return-Path: <@SEGATE.SUNET.SE:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sC1uL-0009acC; Thu, 18 May 95 12:30 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0sC1uL-0009acC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id 1A7CAF31 ; Thu, 18 May 1995 11:29:29 +0200
Date:         Thu, 18 May 1995 05:26:45 -0400
Reply-To:     "Dylan P. Thurston" <DPT@HUMA1.BITNET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         "Dylan P. Thurston" <DPT@HUMA1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Quantifiers (was Re: A modest proposal #2: verdicality)
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
In-Reply-To:  <199505180828.EAA04730@abel.math.harvard.edu>
Content-Length: 377
Lines: 10

mi cusku di'e
 > Hold on, let's back up.  I was intending to give alternatives for
 > "There are _exactly_ three men in the room", but I think most of my
 > alternatives fell short, saying, at most, "there are _at least_ three
 > men in the room".  Which of the following work?  What the best way to
 > say this?

.i zoi gy. men .gy ba'ibo zoi gy. women .gy

mu'o mi'e. dilyn.