From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Sat May 20 19:27:05 1995
Date:         Sat, 20 May 1995 19:29:39 EDT
From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Subject:      Re: Quantifiers
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
Message-ID: <QyZzSotufSE.A.N2E.5t0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

>  > Maybe you could say:
>  >
>  >         le namcu pe lei nanmu pe ne'i le kumfa cu du li ci
>
> I think I'd prefer
>         le se klani be lo'i nanmu pe ne'i le kumfa cu du li ci

Why a set?  A set is not a quantity, is it?  At least say {le se klani
be lei nanmu pe ne'i le kumfa}

> but I have no idea what would go in the x3 of {klani} if {le namcu}
> doesn't work.

How about this:

        le se klani be lei nanmu bei lo ckilu be le ka xokau ke'a
        cu nenri le kumfa cu du li ci

> (Maybe it should be {le si'o nanmcu}?)

The idea of number?  I don't really understand why scales are supposed
to be {si'o}.

Jorge