Return-Path: <@SEGATE.SUNET.SE:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0s9Zab-0009adC; Thu, 11 May 95 17:51 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0s9Zab-0009adC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id ECAA2ACD ; Thu, 11 May 1995 16:51:28 +0100
Date:         Thu, 11 May 1995 10:46:00 -0400
Reply-To:     Dylan Thurston <dpt@MATH.HARVARD.EDU>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Dylan Thurston <dpt@MATH.HARVARD.EDU>
Subject:      Re: TEXT: le gunse ku joi le lorxu
X-To:         Lojban List <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
In-Reply-To:  <Pine.SOL.3.91.950511051051.2537A-100000@abel>
Content-Length: 306
Lines: 9

mi pu ciska

> The x2 of jimpe is a fact, not a person.  Shouldn't it be {le ka ma do na
> ka'e seljmi}?  ({ma do} standing for {le do selsku} or {le do te djuno}.)

Sorry, I meant {le ka tu'a do no ka'e seljmi} or {le ka me do no ka'e
seljmi}.  What's the difference between these two?

co'o mi'e. dilyn.