From @gate.demon.co.uk,@uga.cc.uga.edu:lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Thu May 25 23:04:26 1995 Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP id AA3103 ; Thu, 25 May 95 23:04:24 BST Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk via puntmail for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk; Thu, 25 May 95 21:07:56 GMT Received: from gate.demon.co.uk by punt2.demon.co.uk id aa03749; 25 May 95 22:06 +0100 Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by gate.demon.co.uk id aa03360; 25 May 95 16:40 GMT-60:00 Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4012; Thu, 25 May 95 11:35:18 EDT Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2899; Thu, 25 May 1995 11:21:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 May 1995 11:24:13 EDT Reply-To: jorge@phyast.pitt.edu Sender: Lojban list From: jorge@phyast.pitt.edu Subject: Re: veridicality of lo - late response X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Iain Alexander Message-ID: <9505251640.aa03360@gate.demon.co.uk> Status: R And: > I'd have thought {da voi tanxe} and {le tanxe} should be synonymous. > I don't see any grounds for their being different. They have different quantifiers. {da voi tanxe} is {su'o le tanxe}, and {le tanxe} is {ro da voi tanxe}. Jorge