Return-Path: <@SEGATE.SUNET.SE:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sAZtw-0009acC; Sun, 14 May 95 12:23 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0sAZtw-0009acC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id A744CF44 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 11:23:51 +0100
Date:         Sun, 14 May 1995 05:22:12 -0400
Reply-To:     Dylan Thurston <dpt@MATH.HARVARD.EDU>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Dylan Thurston <dpt@MATH.HARVARD.EDU>
Subject:      cmene for "Thurston"
X-To:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
In-Reply-To:  <199505140758.AA18309@access1.digex.net>
Content-Length: 379
Lines: 9

Hmm.  In my pronunciation, there seems to be a vowel before the "n", at
least when I articulate carefully; but {trstn.} is perhaps closer than the
alternatives.  But doesn't it then end in a vowel?  Or do pseudo-vowels
not count here?  Probably not, as they never occur in gismu, cmavo, or
lujvo.

co'o mi'e dilyn.

(Hmm.  Perhaps that should be {dil,n.}  No, I don't think so.)