From @gate.demon.co.uk,@uga.cc.uga.edu:lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Fri Jun 09 22:06:53 1995 Received: from stryx.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP id AA3351 ; Fri, 09 Jun 95 22:06:52 BST Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP id AA3343 ; Fri, 09 Jun 95 22:06:23 BST Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk via puntmail for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk; Fri, 09 Jun 95 05:59:20 GMT Received: from gate.demon.co.uk by punt2.demon.co.uk id aa12076; 9 Jun 95 6:57 +0100 Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by gate.demon.co.uk id aa15227; 8 Jun 95 13:57 GMT-60:00 Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8405; Thu, 08 Jun 95 08:55:14 EDT Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0432; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 08:49:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 08:45:41 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: non-existance predications X-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Iain Alexander Message-ID: <9506081357.aa15227@gate.demon.co.uk> Status: R >> or le'i se cmima be noda > >That's the set of things that don't have members. Probably a set with >infinitely many elements. I'm confused. Isn't the empty set defined as the set of things that doesn't have members, and that there is only one such set? lojbab