From @gate.demon.co.uk,@uga.cc.uga.edu:lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Fri Jun 09 22:04:00 1995 Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP id AA3313 ; Fri, 09 Jun 95 22:03:57 BST Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk via puntmail for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk; Thu, 08 Jun 95 00:51:51 GMT Received: from gate.demon.co.uk by punt2.demon.co.uk id aa28950; 8 Jun 95 1:50 +0100 Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by gate.demon.co.uk id aa05870; 7 Jun 95 21:46 GMT-60:00 Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3277; Wed, 07 Jun 95 15:19:55 EDT Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0590; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 13:43:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 1995 13:34:48 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: cnino cifnu X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Iain Alexander Message-ID: <9506072146.aa05870@gate.demon.co.uk> Status: R >> What would a "new infant" be other than "a just created person"? > >Maybe a "new lion"? I thought you were being metaphorical. :) >cinfo = lion; cifnu = infant Or, ignoring that problem, you can ask le cifnu cu cnino ma ma ma You might want citrai (superlatively young) for a new-born infant. If people don't like my using slabu for old = aged, then they shouldn't like using cnino = newborn. lojbab