Return-Path: <@SEGATE.SUNET.SE:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sPErK-0000YjC; Fri, 23 Jun 95 22:57 EET DST Message-Id: Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id C19807A8 ; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 21:57:11 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 15:56:16 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: pc answers To: Lojban List In-Reply-To: <199506231935.PAA15302@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Jun 23, 95 06:23:26 pm Content-Length: 540 Lines: 18 la .and. cusku di'e > Could you remind me why (or whether) {ci nanmu cu pencu ci gerku} > doesn't violate goatleg? Because of the implicit restriction to an unspecified time and place. My take on the 3-dog/9-dog problem is that all the standard forms specify nine dogs, and that to get three dogs you use: vu'i ci gerku cu batci vu'i ci nanmu which creates two sequences, one of dogs and one of men. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.