Return-Path: <@SEGATE.SUNET.SE:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sPXnB-0000YrC; Sat, 24 Jun 95 19:10 EET DST Message-Id: Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id 4B126F3E ; Sat, 24 Jun 1995 18:03:37 +0200 Date: Sat, 24 Jun 1995 12:01:34 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: ve'i X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 566 Lines: 14 I think Jorge is right that ve'i sequences are like sets. I think we might want to consider: perhaps what would be best would be to take therespectively joi operator and move it to LAhE, in which case it would only require "ce" between terms inside. The advantage is a clearer and simpler use of the respectively operator. On the other hand, in writing this, I suddenly realize that this would eliminate the ability to use "respectively" in selbri (e.g. jack and jill, respectively walked and ran up the hill.), so perhaps this would not be a good idea. lojbab