From @uga.cc.uga.edu:lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Sat Jun 24 00:38:58 1995 Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP id AA3583 ; Sat, 24 Jun 95 00:38:57 BST Received: from punt2.demon.co.uk via puntmail for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk; Fri, 23 Jun 95 19:59:46 GMT Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by punt2.demon.co.uk id aa29029; 23 Jun 95 20:58 +0100 Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4991; Fri, 23 Jun 95 15:56:44 EDT Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9680; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 15:55:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 15:56:16 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: pc answers X-To: Lojban List To: Iain Alexander In-Reply-To: <199506231935.PAA15302@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Jun 23, 95 06:23:26 pm Message-ID: <9506232058.aa29029@punt2.demon.co.uk> Status: R la .and. cusku di'e > Could you remind me why (or whether) {ci nanmu cu pencu ci gerku} > doesn't violate goatleg? Because of the implicit restriction to an unspecified time and place. My take on the 3-dog/9-dog problem is that all the standard forms specify nine dogs, and that to get three dogs you use: vu'i ci gerku cu batci vu'i ci nanmu which creates two sequences, one of dogs and one of men. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.