Return-Path: <@SEGATE.SUNET.SE:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sOKcy-0000YkC; Wed, 21 Jun 95 10:55 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0sOKcy-0000YkC@xiron>
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id BF8F8689 ; Wed, 21 Jun 1995 9:42:12 +0200
Date:         Wed, 21 Jun 1995 03:39:53 -0400
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      plipe
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 737
Lines: 22

>la lojbab. cusku di'e
>...
> > The current place structure is:
> >
> > <x1 (agent/object) leaps/jumps/springs/bounds to x2 from x3
>
>Not unless it's changed since the latest gismu list; I have
>
>plipe
>x1 (agent/object) leaps/jumps/springs/bounds to x2 from x3 reaching
>height x4 propelled by x5
>
>Was this a typo or a misreading?

Neither, a case of not checking the gismu list.  I think we added the
other two places the last time this topic came up, probably based on
reasoning similar to the lines the debate has taken this time, except
that at that point we were tending to expand rather than contract place
structures.  The current official place structure takes in a somewhat
larger variety of jumps than it used to.

lojbab