Return-Path: Received: from uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0saubJ-0000ZFC; Wed, 26 Jul 95 03:45 EET DST Received: from oboe.cs.uq.oz.au by uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au id ; Wed, 26 Jul 95 10:43:10 +1000 Message-Id: <9507260043.AA29824@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> To: veion@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi Subject: Re: Pretty Little Girls School Date: Wed, 26 Jul 1995 10:43:09 +1000 From: Tim Mansfield Content-Length: 1330 Lines: 32 coi doi veion. la veion cusku di'e > The rest depends on your background. > If you know about language parsing, elisp, slang, user interface > design, knowledge representation, text databases, hypertext or > anything else which might be useful for designing and implementing > various kinds of software tools, I can provide a list of things > I have thought might be useful. My research is in the user interface area and I have peripheral interests in hypertext and knowledge representation. Please send your list... Does Bob still need dictionary volunteers (probably better to ask this of Bob)? Software tools is an interesting area though. We've been discussing locally what a useful tool would be that works best with lojban proficiency. We've only early ideas yet, but we've been thinking somethings that use Lojban in their interfaces might be part of a solution to the problem of why people should bother learning Lojban in the first place... Bob's list of reasons to learn Lojban is good and there's several reasons there which are good enough for me, but most people seem to get initially enthusiastic and then after a couple of weeks start to ask themselves what use it is. It's difficult. Is this an appropriate discussion for Lojban list or is that mainly for technical discussions? co'o mi'e tim.