Return-Path: <@SEGATE.SUNET.SE:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sXPo0-0000ZKC; Sun, 16 Jul 95 12:16 EET DST
Message-Id: <m0sXPo0-0000ZKC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id F90CD005 ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 1:44:22 +0200
Date:         Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:40:42 -0700
Reply-To:     Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
Subject:      Re: 3 men touch 3 dogs
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 623
Lines: 20

xorxes said:
>la djer cusku di'e
>
>> 1. lo ci nanmu ku goi da ci lo gerku ku goi de zo'u tu'e da pencu de
>
>At least one of the three men that there are touches exactly three dogs.
>
Thanks for the response.  I see that I forgot about the implicit
quantifier su'o in front of lo ci.  What I wanted to say was:

1. ro lo ci nanmu ku goi da ci lo gerku ku goi de zo'u tu'e da pencu de
2. ro lo ci nanmu ku goi da ci lo so gerku ku goi de zo'u tu'e da pencu
de
3. ro lo ci nanmu ku goi da ci lo ci gerku ku goi de zo'u tu'e da pencu
de

I'll comment on  what I think they mean when others post a response, if
they do.

djer