From <@uga.cc.uga.edu:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Thu Sep 14 09:43:54 1995 Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu (uga.cc.uga.edu [128.192.1.5]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with SMTP id JAA07340 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 09:43:52 -0400 Message-Id: <199509141343.JAA07340@locke.ccil.org> Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with BSMTP id 0285; Thu, 14 Sep 95 09:28:39 EDT Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3523; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 09:09:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 16:08:43 +0300 Reply-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Sender: Lojban list From: Veijo Vilva Subject: Re: afterthought conn within NU? To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Status: OR > Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 09:54:40 EDT > From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU > Subject: Re: afterthought conn within NU? >> I certainly don't >> know how to do it, but I'd always assumed that that was because I >> don't know how to do most things Lojban is capable of. Nik says to >> Ivan that the solution is to insert a {kei} plus sumti conn >> (i.e., I presume, {le nu .... kei e le nu...}) but that quite >> obviously distorts the semantics (so much so that I conclude I >> misunderstood the discussion due to poor audio quality). > > There is no solution, you either use forethought or you lost the > possibility of connecting anything. > > Here is an ugly trick to get around it: > > le nu ko'a broda zo'e zo'e gi'e brode fa ko'e zo'e zo'e Another possibility is to connect events nu ko'a broda kei gi'e nu ko'e brode -- co'o mi'e veion --------------------------------- .i mi du la'o sy. Veijo Vilva sy. ---------------------------------