Return-Path: <@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0stLTw-0000ZLC; Fri, 15 Sep 95 00:06 EET DST
Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id AAA24580 for <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:06:03 +0300
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (MAILER@CUNYVMV2)
 by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V5.0-3 #2494) id <01HVA9VS5I4W00098T@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>
 for veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:06:57 +0200 (EET)
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@CUNYVM)
 by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5986; Thu,
 14 Sep 1995 17:05:12 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 22:04:49 +0100
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject: Veion on bridi conn
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Reply-to: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Message-id: <01HVA9VSCP4Y00098T@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 365
Lines: 12

Veion:
>  Another possibility is to connect events
>         nu ko'a broda kei gi'e nu ko'e brode
 
The logic needs to be thought through, but it seems clear
to me that nothing is {duhu broda kei gihe brode kei}, while
there is exactly one {duhu ge broda gi brode kei}.
(An analogous nonsense is {li pa gihe li re} (irrespective
of whether it's grammatical).
 
And