Return-Path: <@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sxAGU-0000ZOC; Mon, 25 Sep 95 11:55 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id LAA07196 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 11:55:56 +0200 Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (MAILER@CUNYVMV2) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V5.0-3 #2494) id <01HVOYRHARRK000ZB4@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> for veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 12:51:58 +0200 (EET) Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@CUNYVM) by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4204; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 16:16:49 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 21:15:05 +0100 From: ucleaar Subject: Re: direction, dimension Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: ucleaar Message-id: <01HVOZIQF5UK000ZB4@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1646 Lines: 38 Iain: > jorge@phyast.pitt.edu writes: > > Yes, well, what are the two dimensions of a circle, for example? > > I could understand a gismu that meant "x1 is x2-dimensional", but > > I don't think that it makes any sense to say that there are exactly > > two (or three) things that are the dimensions of some object. > > Could you list those two or three things for a given object? > Given > cimde x1 (property - ka) is a dimension of space/object x2 > according to rules/model x3 > clani x1 is long in dimension/direction x2 (default longest dimension) > by measurement standard x3 > perhaps they are things like {lo ka [se] clani/ganra/condi}. My reservation about this is that {lo se clani be koa} is not merely koa's longest dimension, but also the dimension in which koa is long in. For example, for people, their longest dimension is the vertical one, but people can still be short - so would {da se clani koa} be true if koa is short? Assuming we are resigned to working within the constraints established by the existing gismu and their definitions (and to my regret, we seem to be), then the following lujvo could serve: torcla x1 has extent in longest dimension x2 of x3 units jakganra x1 has extent in median dimension x2 of x3 units cinltsu x1 has extent in shortest dimension x2 of x3 units dizgaltu x1 has extent in vertical dimension x2 of x3 units zulpritu x1 has extent in lateral dimension x2 of x3 units cratrixe x1 has extent in transverse dimension x2 of x3 units In this case the dimensions are {se torcla, se jakganra, se cinltsu} and {se dizgaltu, se zulpritu, se cratrixe}. --- And