Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id HAA01741 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 07:48:38 -0400
Message-Id: <199509201148.HAA01741@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id E875588A ; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 1:57:30 -0400
Date:         Wed, 20 Sep 1995 01:29:23 -0400
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: quantifiers
X-To:         pcliffje@CRL.COM
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Sep 20 07:48:40 1995
X-From-Space-Address: <@VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM:LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>

Not having followed the argument that led up to this "ro broda" proposal,
can you summarize for me what the alternatives are, and which one you are
proposing.  And if this applies to ci broda identically.

Specifically, I am curious as to what "ro lo broda" means under the current
argument, so I know why you are calling it the "odd notion" interpretation
of "ro broda".

lojbab