Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id HAA25245 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 07:10:18 -0400 Message-Id: <199510011110.HAA25245@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id 7120CE13 ; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 6:48:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 1995 22:50:48 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: h for apostrophe X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Sun Oct 1 07:10:20 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU >The motivation is partly aesthetic, and partly practical. The {'} is >typographically ugly when preponderant. Most software doesn't recognize >it as a within-word character. Omitting it altogether makes the text >briefer and more pleasing to the eye. I could go into more details, but >won't bother. I understand all of these except one. Most software used in processing language had better accept the apostrophe as being an acceptable character in a word, since it is fairly common in English (probably more common than 'z', 'q', or 'x'). You even used it in "won't" in the paragraph above. As far as I know, it is only in programming languages that apostrophe is a special character. We use 'h' instead of apostrophe in the YACC grammar, therefore, since YACC takes a text file that meets C language conventions. A lot of the rest is just aesthetics. >I< happen to like having a language that looks unlike English - it helps remind me to avoid malglico usages. But that wasn't much a factor when we made the decision - the goal was to have a consonantal sound that was not a consonant for morphology purposes, and making it look different from a regular alphabetic character seemed like an excellent way to go about it. But we've been over this many times. %^) I don't like having to exclude And's texts - I just processed 3 years worth of archives into a new set of lujvo for processing into the dictionary. But all my means of recognizing Lojban words pretty much require that I shrink down the words to process by eliminating those with non-Lojban letters like 'h', and to expect certain patterns of consonant and vowel. In only a couple of cases did I see a word that was clearly an And Rosta Lojban word and manually "saved it" from oblivion by putting the apostrophe back in. lojbab