Return-Path: <@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0svHko-0000ZOC; Wed, 20 Sep 95 08:31 EET DST
Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA24626 for <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 08:31:29 +0300
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (MAILER@CUNYVMV2)
 by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V5.0-3 #2494) id <01HVHR08AOI8000ROK@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>
 for veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 08:32:27 +0200 (EET)
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@CUNYVM)
 by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2362; Wed,
 20 Sep 1995 01:31:02 -0400
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 01:29:23 -0400
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject: Re: quantifiers
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Reply-to: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Message-id: <01HVHR08ZOWM000ROK@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-To: pcliffje@CRL.COM
X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 382
Lines: 10

Not having followed the argument that led up to this "ro broda" proposal,
can you summarize for me what the alternatives are, and which one you are
proposing.  And if this applies to ci broda identically.
 
Specifically, I am curious as to what "ro lo broda" means under the current
argument, so I know why you are calling it the "odd notion" interpretation
of "ro broda".
 
lojbab