Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (psuvm.psu.edu [128.118.56.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with SMTP id QAA14618 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 16:31:49 -0400 Message-Id: <199509162031.QAA14618@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1420; Sat, 16 Sep 95 16:09:01 EDT Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2638; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 16:04:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 20:48:01 GMT Reply-To: ia@stryx.demon.co.uk Sender: Lojban list From: Iain Alexander Subject: Re: jvajvo query X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Sat Sep 16 16:31:53 1995 X-From-Space-Address: <@PSUVM.PSU.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> In message <9509160408.aa28205@punt2.demon.co.uk> ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk writes: > QUESTION ONE > Can anyone recall the jvajvo recommendations for, say, > {koa troci/djica lo (dahi) nu koa te dunda koe}? Should it be > {koa troci zei te zei dunda koe} or {koa te zei dunda zei > troci koe}? The natural language pattern is generally the > latter (at least according to current theory). I don't remember specifically, but I tend to prefer the latter. > QUESTION TWO > How does one distinguish (tahi loe jvajvo) between > [[te zei broda] zei brode] versus [te zei [broda zei brode]]? {te zei ke zei (broda zei brode)} -- Iain Alexander ia@stryx.demon.co.uk I.Alexander@bra0125.wins.icl.co.uk