Received: from louie.udel.edu (mmdf@louie.udel.edu [128.175.1.3]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with SMTP id TAA29281 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 19:38:40 -0400 Received: from snow-white-fddi.udel.edu by louie.udel.edu id aa23442; 5 Sep 95 19:20 EDT Received: from louie.udel.edu by snow-white.ee.udel.edu id aa03556; 5 Sep 95 19:20 EDT Received: from snow-white.ee.udel.edu by stimpy.eecis.udel.edu id aa28714; 5 Sep 95 23:20 GMT To: cowan@ccil.org Subject: Re: GFP-FAQ In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 05 Sep 1995 18:53:52 EDT." <199509052253.SAA14064@ritz.mordor.com> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 1995 19:20:06 -0400 From: John David Chao Message-ID: <9509052320.aa28714@stimpy.eecis.udel.edu> Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Tue Sep 5 19:38:42 1995 X-From-Space-Address: <@ee.udel.edu,@louie.udel.edu,@louie.udel.edu:chao@louie.udel.edu> Thanks for the feedback and German clarification. cowan@ccil.org says: | (Minor note: "sie" is both "she" and "they" and indeed "you (polite)" ... | part. For example, "him" is pronounced [him] in a stressed position like | "I saw him, not her"; but it is pronounced [im] in unstressed positions | like "I wanted him to go with me" [aiwantitimtugowiTmi]. Case one seems like an establishment phase, focussing on the individual specifically, and case two seems to be more like referring to an already- established specific individual**, where no real emphasis is needed, and no confusion as to the nature of "him" is expected by the speaker. So... (footnote: **ignoring "if anyone calls, tell them..." types of use) | collides firmly with your 3sg pronoun "em", so that "I saw em" becomes | ambiguous, in spoken English, between "I saw em" and "I saw them". | | This objection, it seems to me, is at least as strong as the similar | objection to "hir". ...this doesn't seem to be a problem to me. "I saw [unstressed them]" is referring to something the listener is already expected to know to be plural. The words preceding (sp?) the sentence would indicate the plural. But in "I saw hir take the peach", previous words may not have established the sex of hir, or the use of GFPs may not have been expected, so confusion would be expected as people plugged in "her". And even if people did know that it was hir and not her, they might still be uncomfortable and/or mocking when a hir was applied to someone known to be male. (I'm assuming an audience hostile to GFPs here, looking for things to pick at.) Also, the problem already exists with [im] and [em], both of which i say just about identically. It never causes confusion. Of course, it is possible to say [ir] and [er] in a way that's fairly easy to pick up, but i don't think all speakers would do this. Comments? John Chao chao@ee.udel.edu