Return-Path: <@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0stfE6-0000ZMC; Fri, 15 Sep 95 21:11 EET DST Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id VAA05382 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 21:11:01 +0300 Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (MAILER@CUNYVMV2) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V5.0-3 #2494) id <01HVBI350KU8000DYJ@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> for veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 21:11:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@CUNYVM) by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4576; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 14:02:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 18:46:06 +0100 From: ucleaar Subject: jvajvo query Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: ucleaar Message-id: <01HVBI352SW2000DYJ@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 431 Lines: 14 QUESTION ONE Can anyone recall the jvajvo recommendations for, say, {koa troci/djica lo (dahi) nu koa te dunda koe}? Should it be {koa troci zei te zei dunda koe} or {koa te zei dunda zei troci koe}? The natural language pattern is generally the latter (at least according to current theory). QUESTION TWO How does one distinguish (tahi loe jvajvo) between [[te zei broda] zei brode] versus [te zei [broda zei brode]]? --- And