Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0t8cKL-0000ZQC; Fri, 27 Oct 95 02:07 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 05AC206B ; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 1:07:17 +0100 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 12:09:28 -0400 Reply-To: cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: NAI X-To: ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: <199510252135.RAA21111@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Oct 25, 95 09:26:24 pm Content-Length: 532 Lines: 15 la .and. cusku di'e > How does {skami ao ao} group? As [[skami ao] ao], or as [skami [ao ao]]? Semantically, it can go either way; see the attitudinal paper at 9.1. The parser doesn't resolve this, showing {skami a'o a'o}. > What about {ta bae ao skami}? Is {bae} emphasizing {skami} and commented The latter, because "ba'e" stuff is done first. The text structure paper gives details on what binds closer than what. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.