From cowan  Sat Mar  6 22:47:36 2010
Subject: Re: rafsi of cmavo
To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
From: cowan
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 10:21:21 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199510141244.IAA28174@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Oct 14, 95 01:42:57 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length:        269
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Oct 17 10:21:21 1995
X-From-Space-Address: cowan
Message-ID: <IcZnMPeypxH.A.3vG.Iw0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la .and. cusku di'e

> A number of cmavo (e.g. {na, zio, nae, mi}) have only CVC
> rafsi. Am I correct in thinking that this means that they
> cannot occur lujvo-finally, unless glued on with {zei}?

Yes.

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.