Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0t8D3d-0000ZQC; Wed, 25 Oct 95 23:08 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id DBB26EBE ; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 22:08:20 +0100 Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 20:36:02 +0300 Reply-To: Cyril Slobin Sender: Lojban list Comments: Resent-From: "Cyril Slobin" Comments: Originally-From: "Cyril Slobin" From: Cyril Slobin Organization: Institute for Commercial Engineering Subject: Re: quantified variables - beginers question X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: <199510251655.TAA16785@feast.fe.msk.ru>; from "jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU" at Wed, 25 Oct 1995 12:50:25 EDT Content-Length: 573 Lines: 18 coi. > ro lo prenu goi ko'a cu prami ko'a > Every person loves all persons. {ro lo prenu goi ko'a} parses as {ro (lo prenu goi ko'a)}, not as {(ro lo prenu) goi ko'a}. So I belive {ko'a} becomes {lo prenu}, not {ro lo prenu}, and the whole sentense is equal to {ro lo prenu co prami lo prenu} expect that the second {lo prenu} refers to the same person as the first. Does it make sense? co'o mi'e. kir. -- Cyril Slobin `When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, `it means just what I choose it to mean'