Received: from access5.digex.net (qlYBsVTekvXHY@[205.197.245.196]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id IAA21690 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 08:46:42 -0500 Received: (from lojbab@localhost) by access5.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA08678 ; for cowan@ccil.org; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 11:27:10 -0500 Received: (from lojbab@localhost) by access5.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA08634 ; for lojbab; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 11:26:48 -0500 From: Logical Language Group Message-Id: <199510301626.LAA08634@access5.digex.net> Subject: "kisto" To: lojbab@access5.digex.net (Logical Language Group) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 11:26:48 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 477 Sender: lojbab@access.digex.net Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Fri Nov 3 00:22:55 1995 X-From-Space-Address: lojbab@access.digex.net The new guy from Italy rightly (I think) points out that "Pashto" doesn't belong in the place structure of "kisto"; the Pashto/Pakhto/Pushtu live almost entirely in Afghanistan, Pashto isn't related to Hindi/Urdu (it's Iranian, not Indic), the culture gap between Pashto and Pakistani is wide, and the name "Pakistan" has nothing to do with "Pashto". Let's fix this one quickly. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.