Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id TAA05078 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 19:49:37 -0400 Message-Id: <199510112349.TAA05078@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id 89B0FEA7 ; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 19:23:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 00:21:21 +0100 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Wed Oct 11 19:49:38 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Kris: > mi pu cusku: > >> mi ponse le la lei'ydan cukta gi'e milxe tadni > .i la .and. cu troci lenu cikre > > ^^ku? ^^se? > .i pe'i na go'i .i pe'i na nitcu zo ku .i ku'i na birti gohi rao > .i zo se cu na drani --> that would mean "I have the lojban book > and am somewhat studied" I thought it would mean "I have the Laadan book and mild studyee". At present is seems to mean "I have the Laadan book and mild student". > >> .i za'a le nimbau la lojban cu mleca leka mulno se skicu > >fi ri juosai ro gerna le jbogerna cu mleca > ^^fa? NO!!? Are you telling me that use of FA affects the x-numbering of subsequent suivla? So without that added {fa} it's as if there were a {fo} there? No! Mercy! > .i go'i > >> .ipe'i go'i fo leka pluja .e leka cinri > >na jimpe i ma pluja ije ma cinri? > .u'u zo fo na.e zo fi .i la lojban cu zmadu fi leka pluja .e leka cinri jimpe kie --- And