Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id AAA26534 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Sun, 15 Oct 1995 00:50:37 -0400
Message-Id: <199510150450.AAA26534@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id 0D50ABBB ; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 22:29:56 -0400
Date:         Sun, 15 Oct 1995 03:17:06 MET
Reply-To: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
Subject:      Re: tenses
X-To:         Lojban Listserv <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Sun Oct 15 00:50:58 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU

> > > >fi ri juosai       ro gerna le jbogerna cu mleca
> > >               ^^fa?
> > NO!!? Are you telling me that use of FA affects the x-numbering
> > of subsequent suivla? So without that added {fa} it's as if there
> > were a {fo} there? No! Mercy!
>
> I think {fa} is not needed, but I'm not sure.
>
> Jorge

.i ju'o sarcu .i ko lanli le cipi'ebimoi mupli be le ka lojbo te sumti
be'o pesecu'u le gerna prosa no'u zoi gy. places .gy.

co'o mi'e. goran.

--
GAT/CS/O d?@ H s:-@ !g p1(2)@ !au(0?) a- w+(+++) (!)v-@(+) C++(++++)
UU/H(+) P++>++++ L(>+) !3 E>++ N+ K(+) W--(---) M-- !V(--) -po+ Y(+)
t+@(+++) !5 !j R+@ G-@(J++) tv+(++) b++@ D++ B? e+* u@ h!$ f?(+) r--
!n(+@) y+. GeekCode v2.1, modifications left to reader to puzzle out