Return-Path: <@segate.sunet.se:LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM> Received: from segate.sunet.se by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0t0QuU-0000ZUC; Wed, 4 Oct 95 12:18 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by segate.sunet.se (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id 9EB68FFB ; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 11:18:39 +0200 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 06:17:43 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: tense conversions X-To: slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 1665 Lines: 31 >> But someone making such a claim is not lying, because claims about the >> future are not lies. This is a fact about claims, not about the future. >> To lie is to say what you know is not true, and since you don't know the >> future (even though the world-line model presumes that the future is >> knowable), any claim with "ba" or "pu'o" cannot be a lie unless it >> claims something that you now know to be impossible. > >It's about 'lying', not about tenses. In discussion above we (I, at >least) use formal logic meaning of 'lie' - 'to express something that is >not true', independent of knowledge, intentions etc.. I agree that statements about the future may be pragmatically acceptible even though they could be false predictions. By our conventions, a question is logically false if the answer is negative. Similarly the antecedent of a conditional canbe false, but it is not a lie to state that antecedent. Thus I am inclined to accept the ruling that it doesn't matter whether the ball actually falls off the table (BTW it still falls if it is caught before it hits the ground - you'd have to prevent it from going of the edge %^). What matters is that the speaker is intensionally viewing the falling-off-of- the-table as a complete event. I think that this interpretation is necessary, because in the case of an open-ended event (one with no defined beginning or end), you can still think of it as a complete event. i.e., one could talk about God's actions "pu'o lo munje" before the creation of the universe, without implying that the event which is the universe ever completing or terminating. (I meant "pu'o munje" with no "lo"). lojbab