Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id DAA20509 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 03:47:27 -0400 Message-Id: <199510260747.DAA20509@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id B28A2608 ; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 3:43:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 03:42:41 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Grammar.235 X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Thu Oct 26 03:47:30 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Jown Cowan appears not to have answered yet on this, so let me pipe in. The standard for Lojban grammars is to tolerate NO shift/reduce errors. As far as I know, our testing of grammar.235 produced no s/r errors (and it appears from files John left around today that he tried again and got the same result). This implies that someone's version of YACC is buggy. Failing any clarification from John, I think the thing that is needed is to have those who are finding shift/reduce errors to send us the YACC output that points out the errors. This might need to be the long form of the output (verbose), or just identifying which rules it found problems with. lojbab