Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0t7Gi5-0000ZOC; Mon, 23 Oct 95 08:50 EET
Message-Id: <m0t7Gi5-0000ZOC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id A5DF7F62 ; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 7:50:12 +0100
Date:         Mon, 23 Oct 1995 06:46:35 +0000
Reply-To:     ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: "ko" considered bad
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 513
Lines: 13

John MacJohnbob:
> la paulos. cusku di'e
> > What does "le ko pinsi cu xunre" mean?
> "So act so that the pencil associated with you is red."
> If the pencil associated with you (call it Charles) is not red, then
> you have two choices:  you can replace Charles with a pencil that is
> red, or you can transform Charles so that it is red.

I can't see that replacing Charles is a valid response. Only
transforming Charles is. If replacing Charles is a valid response,
then I'd say {lo ko pinsi cu xunre}.
---
And