Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0t8Eot-0000ZQC; Thu, 26 Oct 95 01:01 EET
Message-Id: <m0t8Eot-0000ZQC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id A0EBDC6A ; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 0:01:13 +0100
Date:         Wed, 25 Oct 1995 20:42:22 +0300
Reply-To:     Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
Organization: Institute for Commercial Engineering
Subject:      Re: quantified variables
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 687
Lines: 21

I'm sorry if this message appears twice in the list -
I'm not sure weither I was really sent it prevous time :-(

coi.

>         ro lo prenu goi ko'a cu prami ko'a
>         Every person loves all persons.

{ro lo prenu goi ko'a} parses as {ro (lo prenu goi ko'a)},
not as {(ro lo prenu) goi ko'a}. So I belive {ko'a} becomes
{lo prenu}, not {ro lo prenu}, and the whole sentense is
equal to {ro lo prenu co prami lo prenu} expect that the
second {lo prenu} refers to the same person as the first.

Does it make sense?

co'o mi'e. kir.

--
Cyril Slobin <slobin@fe.msk.ru> `When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said,
<http://www.fe.msk.ru/~slobin/> `it means just what I choose it to mean'