Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0t3mHX-0000ZOC; Fri, 13 Oct 95 17:44 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 9A90AF51 ; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 16:44:18 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 15:23:28 BST Reply-To: Don Wiggins Sender: Lojban list From: Don Wiggins Subject: Re: "ko" considered bad To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 394 Lines: 15 > You get the imperative of all the other pro-sumti by saying "doimi" doido'o > etc. if it is not clear who "ko" is referring to. Of course, if you are > talking to yourself, it ius obvious who "ko" is. .uasai This is were this problem came from - I was trying to say *.i ko po'u mi'o ku'o citka Let's eat. So this should be .i doimi'o ko citka "ko" considered good. co'o dn.