Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0t3EHX-0000ZWC; Thu, 12 Oct 95 05:26 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 507C37C8 ; Thu, 12 Oct 1995 4:26:07 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 00:21:21 +0100 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 962 Lines: 31 Kris: > mi pu cusku: > >> mi ponse le la lei'ydan cukta gi'e milxe tadni > .i la .and. cu troci lenu cikre > > ^^ku? ^^se? > .i pe'i na go'i .i pe'i na nitcu zo ku .i ku'i na birti gohi rao > .i zo se cu na drani --> that would mean "I have the lojban book > and am somewhat studied" I thought it would mean "I have the Laadan book and mild studyee". At present is seems to mean "I have the Laadan book and mild student". > >> .i za'a le nimbau la lojban cu mleca leka mulno se skicu > >fi ri juosai ro gerna le jbogerna cu mleca > ^^fa? NO!!? Are you telling me that use of FA affects the x-numbering of subsequent suivla? So without that added {fa} it's as if there were a {fo} there? No! Mercy! > .i go'i > >> .ipe'i go'i fo leka pluja .e leka cinri > >na jimpe i ma pluja ije ma cinri? > .u'u zo fo na.e zo fi .i la lojban cu zmadu fi leka pluja .e leka cinri jimpe kie --- And