From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Thu Nov 16 23:14:55 1995 Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id XAA14455 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 23:14:50 -0500 Message-Id: <199511170414.XAA14455@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 25AE6A2B ; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 0:07:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 23:06:04 -0500 Reply-To: Jorge Llambias Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu, jorge@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu Status: OR la lojbab cusku di'e > There could also be some funky elidable effects: > > la noi ciska sutramau be la lojbab. djan. kau,n. would not work without > a be'o or ku'o, but with a brivla istead of lojbab. would be fine. A computer would take the {su} to delete everything that came before and then be left with {tramau be la lojbab. djan. kau,n.}. I suppose you meant {sutrymau}. What a big difference a little typo can make! Jorge